Morning, First, thank you so much for creating this platform and to actively reply. Superb job. Besides live data you also have disruption data. However, many times, and especially with AVL buses, you periodically remove bus stops that will be affected by some kind of disruption (main event; construction work) even if it is for a day. At the same time, on the disruption data, you give the same information. Nevertheless, as stops were already removed the disruption information won't work, being counter-productive. Do you think it is possible to stop removing stops that are going to suffer disruption from the main GTFS?

Thank you for your Feedback concerning our GTFS Data. We have no control over the disruptive data, as we publish the timetable data as we receive it from the operators.

First of all, thank you very much for providing an aggregated dataset covering multiple operators, which makes it much easier to use the data! Would it be possible to provide a stable URL which always redirects to the latest NeTEx feed? Currently, there is a new separate dataset (and therefore a new URL) every week or so. This prevents developers from automatically fetching the latest feed at all times, requiring someone to manually look up the new feed URL every 7 days, which is an infeasible amount of work for larger projects, potentially leading to outdated transit information being used.

Thank you for your feedback concerning our published NeTEx datasets. You can fetch the latest NeTEx URL using the following API endpoint : https://data.public.lu/api/1/datasets/horaires-et-arrets-des-transport-publics-netex/

At this moment the timetable is less than a month. Could they be longer like it was before?

The validity of the data is published as received from the operators.

The current data publication ends at 30 May 2021, but not beyond that. I like the fact that mobiliteit.lu also ends at this exact moment, but it does show there is a problem with publication at the operators.

for example in C88 where can we get the week-end timetable ? What about the *Z, *R,*G, *A ? Thank you for your help. cat C88—_RB.LIN |grep 04732 *Z 04732 C88— % 04732 C88— *R 1 200405035 300000011 200405035 00705 00740 % 04732 C88— *G CRB 300000011 200405035 00705 00740 % 04732 C88— *A VE 300000011 200405035 000036 00705 00740 % 04732 C88— 300000011 Athus, Gare 00705 % 04732 C88— 220903008 Rodange, Gare 00709 00710 % 04732 C88— 220901002 Lamadelaine, Gare 00711 00712 % 04732 C88— 220902006 P▒tange, Gare 00714 00715 % 04732 C88— 190101011 Bascharage/Sanem, Ga 00718 00719 % 04732 C88— 190303002 Schouweiler, Gare 00722 00723 % 04732 C88— 190301004 Dippach-Reckange, Ga 00725 00726 % 04732 C88— 220701005 Leudelange, Gare 00730 00731 % 04732 C88— 200415004 Hollerich, Gare 00735 00736 % 04732 C88— 200405035 Luxembourg, Gare Cen 00740 % 04732 C88— *Z 04732 C88— % 04732 C88— *R 1 200405035 220903008 200405035 00710 00740 % 04732 C88— *G CRB 220903008 200405035 00710 00740 % 04732 C88— *A VE 220903008 200405035 000015 00710 00740 % 04732 C88— 220903008 Rodange, Gare 00710 % 04732 C88— 220901002 Lamadelaine, Gare 00711 00712 % 04732 C88— 220902006 P▒tange, Gare 00714 00715 % 04732 C88— 190101011 Bascharage/Sanem, Ga 00718 00719 % 04732 C88— 190303002 Schouweiler, Gare 00722 00723 % 04732 C88— 190301004 Dippach-Reckange, Ga 00725 00726 % 04732 C88— 220701005 Leudelange, Gare 00730 00731 % 04732 C88— 200415004 Hollerich, Gare 00735 00736 % 04732 C88— 200405035 Luxembourg, Gare Cen 00740 % 04732 C88—

We are sorry but cannot provide you such details due to license restrictions. We recommend to either using open standards like GTFS or Netex.

I'm looking for an estimate on the average number of passenger car decks in a train (for a train with 3 double-deck cars this number would be 6, for example). This information does not appear to be in the data, but is there some means by which I could get such an estimate? Thanks!